GGoCPA us
Sign inStart free
Home / CPAUS-AUD · AUD: Auditing and Attestation / Unit 4: Forming Conclusions and Reporting

CPAUS-AUD · AUD: Auditing and Attestation·UnitCPAUS-AUD · Unit 04Access: Premium

Unit 4: Forming Conclusions and Reporting

Prepare for Unit 4: Forming Conclusions and Reporting with practice questions covering 11 topics. Part of AUD: Auditing and Attestation — build your knowledge and track your progress with GoCPAus.

Questions
165
Topics
11
Access
Premium

What’s in it.

11 topics
  • Topic 01

    Evaluating Audit Findings

    15 questions
  • Topic 02

    Subsequent Events

    15 questions
  • Topic 03

    Going Concern

    15 questions
  • Topic 04

    Standard Auditor's Report

    15 questions
  • Topic 05

    Modified Opinions

    15 questions
  • Topic 06

    Emphasis-of-Matter and Other-Matter Paragraphs

    15 questions
  • Topic 07

    Group Audits

    15 questions
  • Topic 08

    Review Engagements

    15 questions
  • Topic 09

    Compilation Engagements

    15 questions
  • Topic 10

    Attestation Engagements

    15 questions
  • Topic 11

    PCAOB Auditing Standards

    15 questions

Sample questions

3 of many

A few questions from this unit, with the answer and a full explanation. The complete bank is available when you start practising.

  1. Which of the following is a required communication from the GET to a component auditor under AU-C 600?

    • The names and personal information of all management personnel at the parent company
    • The GET's preliminary findings from other components unrelated to the component auditor's work
    • Component materiality and the clearly trivial threshold applicable to the component
      Correct answer
    • The group audit fee and billing arrangement between the GET and the component auditor
    Explanation

    Under AU-C 600, the GET must communicate several items to each component auditor. Required communications include: the scope of the component's work, component materiality and the clearly trivial threshold for the component, significant risks identified by the GET that are relevant to the component, and requests for timely communication of significant matters. Communicating component materiality is essential so the component auditor designs procedures at an appropriate level of sensitivity for the group audit.

  2. Which primary standard governs review engagements of non-issuer annual financial statements?

    • AU-C 930 — Interim Financial Information
    • AR-C 90 under the Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS)
      Correct answer
    • PCAOB AS 4105 — Reviews of Interim Financial Information
    • AT-C 210 — Review Engagements under the SSAEs
    Explanation

    AR-C 90 — Review of Financial Statements, issued under SSARS by the AICPA Accounting and Review Services Committee — governs reviews of annual financial statements for non-issuer entities. AU-C 930 governs interim (quarterly) reviews for non-issuers. AT-C 210 governs attestation review engagements (subject matter other than historical financial statements). PCAOB AS 4105 governs interim reviews for issuers.

  3. An auditor discovers a $5,000 misstatement in an executive compensation accrual. The clearly trivial threshold is $20,000. Although the amount falls below the clearly trivial threshold, the misstatement appears to reflect intentional inflation of the CEO's bonus. Should the auditor accumulate this misstatement and consider it material?

    • No; the clearly trivial threshold is an absolute rule — misstatements below it can never be material
    • Yes; but only if the misstatement also exceeds performance materiality
    • No; compensation-related misstatements are always excluded from the materiality analysis because they involve subjective estimates
    • Yes; a misstatement involving potential management fraud may be qualitatively material regardless of the dollar amount, and the auditor should consider its implications under AU-C 240
      Correct answer
    Explanation

    While the clearly trivial threshold defines when misstatements need not be accumulated, it does not override qualitative materiality assessments. A misstatement involving potential management fraud — particularly one involving executive compensation — has significant qualitative characteristics: it may indicate management override of controls, violate regulatory requirements, and mislead investors who rely on executive compensation disclosures. Under SEC SAB 99 qualitative factors and AU-C 240 fraud considerations, the auditor must consider such misstatements even when the dollar amount is below the clearly trivial threshold. This is a high-difficulty concept that tests integration of multiple standards.