Home / Blog / hardest CPA section

hardest CPA section

Is FAR the Hardest CPA Section?

Test paper and pencil on a desk
Photo by Andy Barbour on Pexels

The Short Answer

By pass rate data, FAR is the hardest CPA section. It consistently records the lowest pass rate of the four (typically 40–48%), requires the most study hours, and covers more distinct material than any other section.

But pass rate is not the whole story. The difficulty of any CPA section is partly absolute and partly relative to your background. For certain candidates, FAR is not the hardest section, and understanding why helps you calibrate your preparation.

What Makes FAR Genuinely Hard

Volume of Material

FAR covers more distinct content areas than any other CPA section:

  • Financial statement preparation and presentation: income statements, balance sheets, statements of cash flows, and comprehensive income under US GAAP
  • Specific GAAP topics: revenue recognition (ASC 606), lease accounting (ASC 842), business combinations (ASC 805), financial instruments, and stock-based compensation
  • Governmental accounting: fund accounting, GASB standards, modified accrual basis, and the government-wide versus fund-level reporting framework
  • Not-for-profit financial reporting: net asset classification, donor restrictions, contribution recognition, and functional expense reporting
  • Conceptual framework: the FASB framework for how GAAP standards are developed and applied

Most CPA candidates come from private-sector accounting backgrounds. That means they arrive at FAR with solid foundations in commercial GAAP but essentially no preparation for governmental accounting, which operates under an entirely different set of standards (GASB rather than FASB) and uses a fund-based reporting model that has no equivalent in commercial accounting.

Governmental Accounting: The Difficulty Spike

Ask any FAR examiner or review course instructor which topic produces the most failed questions on FAR and the answer is consistently governmental accounting. The reasons are structural:

  1. It requires unlearning. GASB and FASB frameworks differ at a fundamental level. Applying FASB logic to a governmental accounting question produces the wrong answer. Candidates who know commercial GAAP well sometimes perform worse on governmental accounting questions than those with no prior knowledge, because their FASB instincts lead them astray.

  2. Fund types are numerous and testable in detail. The major government fund types (general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, capital projects funds, permanent funds, enterprise funds, internal service funds, and fiduciary funds) each have different characteristics, reporting requirements, and basis of accounting rules. Knowing that fund types exist is not enough; you need to know which one applies in a given scenario.

  3. Most candidates have no practical experience with it. Unlike audit, tax, or financial reporting, most candidates have never seen a government fund accounting system in the course of their work.

ASC 842 Lease Accounting

The lease accounting overhaul under ASC 842 (effective for public companies in 2019, private companies in 2022) replaced the old ASC 840 operating/capital lease distinction with a new right-of-use asset and lease liability recognition model. For candidates who learned lease accounting under the old standard, or who know IFRS 16 rather than US GAAP, ASC 842 requires relearning rather than reviewing.

The FAR exam tests ASC 842 extensively, including operating versus finance lease classification, measurement of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, and lessee versus lessor accounting. Candidates who rely on prior knowledge without confirming it matches current ASC 842 requirements regularly fail these questions.

Complexity of Task-Based Simulations

FAR's task-based simulations are among the most complex in the CPA exam. TBSs can require preparing a partial set of financial statements, completing a consolidation workpaper, researching FASB ASC guidance, or analysing financial ratios across multiple scenarios. These are not rapid-answer questions. They require careful setup, understanding of the relevant standards, and methodical execution under time pressure.

When FAR Is Not the Hardest Section

For candidates with a government accounting background. If you have worked in a state or local government finance role, a public sector audit team, or have prior coursework in governmental accounting, the topic that derails most FAR candidates will be familiar rather than foreign. These candidates often report AUD or REG as more demanding relative to their preparation.

For candidates without a tax background. REG's federal income taxation content (covering individual, corporate, S corporation, and partnership taxation) is extremely detail-dense. Candidates who have never done tax work often find REG as difficult as FAR, if not more so. The pass rate for REG (typically 58–64%) is higher than FAR's, but that partly reflects the population of candidates: many REG candidates have prior tax experience.

For candidates without audit experience. AUD's standards-based scenario questions require genuine understanding of how audit engagements work. Candidates without public accounting experience sometimes find AUD's applied scenarios difficult to navigate, since knowing the standard is not the same as knowing how to apply it in context.

How to Approach FAR Preparation

Given FAR's breadth and difficulty, the preparation strategy needs to be different from how you might approach a narrower section.

Budget more time. Most candidates need 150–200 hours of preparation for FAR. If you are studying alongside full-time work (1–2 hours per day), that is 12–16 weeks. Underestimating FAR's time requirement is the most common reason candidates fail it.

Treat governmental accounting as a separate subject. Do not assume commercial GAAP knowledge transfers to governmental accounting questions. Study governmental accounting from scratch, recognise it as distinct, and use practice questions specifically on that content area to build the pattern recognition it requires.

Prioritise by exam weight but prepare fully on government. The AICPA exam blueprint shows the content weighting for FAR. Financial statement preparation and analysis carries the highest weight. But governmental accounting, despite its lower stated weight, is disproportionately hard, and a few mastered government accounting questions can mean the difference between a pass and a fail.

Start practice questions early. FAR practice questions under exam conditions are the best way to discover which areas of FAR you actually know versus which ones you just think you know. Start within your first week of preparation, not after you have finished all the reading.

The Honest Verdict

FAR is the hardest CPA section by the objective measure of pass rates and by the measure of average preparation hours required. For most candidates (those without a government accounting background and those studying FAR for the first time), it deserves the reputation.

But "hardest" is always relative to the candidate. The right framing is not "is FAR hard?" but "where do I have the least preparation and the furthest to travel?" For some candidates, that is FAR. For others, it might be governmental accounting within FAR, or REG's entity taxation content, or AUD's standards-based scenarios.

The productive response to FAR's difficulty is to allocate the study hours it actually requires, start practice questions earlier than feels comfortable, and build genuine exam-level understanding rather than surface familiarity with the material.

Ready to put this into practice?Create a free account and turn what you've just read into real exam-style practice questions.
Start practising free

Read alongside